Occupy Exposes Lack of Press Freedom


The United States credit score is not the only rating that has recently taken a beating. While the United States criticized countries in the Middle East for attempting to censor the press and infringing on the freedom of the press, at home journalists covering the Occupy movement have been targeted by law enforcement and arrested. The Occupy movement has aimed to expose the injustice of corporate greed, but ultimately has exposed the lack of freedom in the press. The United States’ fell 27 spots on the Press Freedom Index for 2011–2012. Reporter’s Without Borders ranked 47th on the latest index.

In the land of the free, journalists should not fear being targeted by law enforcement when doing their job. The crackdown on journalists covering the Occupy movement is yet one more example of why it is so important to begin the conversation that will ultimately move the world forward and allow us to keep our cherished freedoms. It is important as citizens to understand that our freedoms are not guaranteed, and we only have as much freedom as we are willing to fight for. As a nation, we owe it to ourselves to fight for our freedoms. I am not an activist or career protestor, but I am an American citizen who enjoys freedom. There is a responsibility that rests with each of us to continue the conversation that has emerged from Zuccotti Park.


4 responses »

  1. Pingback: Indon journos challenge OSA-like secrets law « uppercaise

  2. Wow! Great video. I can’t believe that a journalist was thrown to the ground for trying to get his story. You are correct. Is it freedom when you are stopped from getting the story to/for the public?

    I think the “intimidation tactic” that they speak of in the video IS worth it!

  3. Pingback: Freedom of the press | Bell Book Candle

  4. This relates to a quote I flagged when reading Andrew McAfee’s “Web 2.0 and the Emergence of Emergence,” describing journalist A.J. Liebling’s comment that “freedom of the press is limited to those who own one” (2009, p. 6). However, today with the “multi-media printing press and global distribution network,” the internet, I would have assumed freedom of the press would be more accessible (p. 6). Based on your blog post and other readings it does not seem to be the case, which is frightening.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s